USCIS recently released its updated FAQs on the electronic registration for FY2022. Those questions can be accessed via the link below:
One of those questions concerns multiple filings by related entities for the same beneficiary.
USCIS reminds applicants that an employer may not file more than one H-1B petition for the same beneficiary in the same fiscal year. To do so would give the beneficiary an unfair advantage over other applicants, on the basis that more petitions are likely to give the beneficiary a higher chance of being selected.
However, USCIS also reminds applicants that related entities such as a parent company, subsidiary or affiliate cannot file multiple petitions unless they have a legitimate business need. For example, if two IT staffing companies are owned by the same individual or group of individuals, those two companies cannot file two separate H-1B petitions for the same beneficiary, unless there are two separate positions available.
However, the definition of related entities does not only include entities related through corporate ownership or control but also includes entities that file similar H-1B petitions for the same beneficiary for substantially the same job.
For example, if an Employer is filing a cap-subject H-1B petition for a beneficiary who is working at end-client A, that same end-client cannot also file a cap petition. Even though the Employer and end-client may be completely unrelated the fact that they are filing multiple petitions for the same beneficiary for substantially the same job is sufficient to be considered related in the eyes of USCIS. The more similarities between the two petitions the more likely that the entities will be considered related.
USCIS has directed its officers to follow the reasoning in the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) in the Matter of S- Inc., Adopted Decision 2018-02 (AAO Mar. 23, 2018). In this case two entities had filed almost identical petitions for the same beneficiary to work at the same end-client location through the same mid-vendors and the documentation included in each petition demonstrated that both entities intended to employ the beneficiary in the same job at the same end-client location. The AAO concluded that the entities were related, despite having no legal relationship.
Where related entities file petitions for the same beneficiary for the same job then all petitions will be denied or revoked, unless all of the related entities can demonstrate a legitimate business need to file separate petitions. In order to demonstrate a legitimate business need there would need to be two separate jobs available.
If you have questions about filing multiple petitions for the same beneficiary, please reach our to PLG Partner Chris Prescott at email@example.com.